The case was brought by the Ngaliwurru and Nungali Peoples who are the recognised native title holders of their traditional land and waters in the north-west of the Northern Territory near the Victoria River. Following their recognition as native title holders, the Ngaliwurru and Nungali Peoples sought compensation on just terms for loss, diminution, impairment or other effect on their native title rights and interests.
While the reasoning is highly fact specific, we now have judicial guidance on these complex topics.
|
Federal Court
20 July 2016 [1]
|
Full Federal Court
20 July 2017
|
High Court
13 March 2019
|
Economic loss
|
80% of the freehold value of
the land at the date the compensable act occurred
$512,400
|
65% of the freehold value of
the land at the date the compensable act occurred
$416,325
|
50% of the freehold value of
the land at the date the compensable act occurred
$320,250
|
Interest
|
Simple interest from the date
the compensable act occurred to the date of judgment
$1,488,261
|
Upheld - pattern of business
investments did not warrant payment of compound interest
$1,183,121
|
Upheld - noting compound
interest is available but not warranted in this instance
$910,100
|
Non-economic loss/ Cultural loss
|
Calculated on a global basis
having regard to the consequential effects on the ability to care for country
$1,300,000
|
Upheld
$1,300,000
|
Upheld - noting that the
trial judge heard all of the evidence
and that this figure may be rightly regarded by society as an appropriate
award for cultural loss
$1,300,000
|
|
$3,300,261
|
$2,899,446
|
$2,530,350
|
VGSO advises government departments, agencies and statutory authorities on how to comply with the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 (Vic) and the Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010 (Vic). This is part of VGSO's exclusive area of work.
We appear for the State of Victoria in Federal Court proceedings and mediations as well as mining arbitrations conducted by the National Native Title Tribunal.
We are well placed to advise you on the implications of this significant case and compliance generally in relation to any Crown land dealings across the State.
To find out more contact:
Julie Freeman
Assistant Victorian Government Solicitor
Assistant Victorian Government Solicitor
99471404
Managing Principal Solicitor
99471419
Principal Solicitor
99471435
Principal Solicitor
99471422
[1] Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia
(No 3) [2016] FCA 900
[2] Northern Territory of Australia v Griffiths [2017]
FCAFC 106
[3] Northern Territory of Australia v Griffiths [2019]
HCA 7